Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is very difficult to make a decision of saving the lives of endangered animals or starving people. Although we have destroyed many places in earth and cause invaluable animals facing terrible situation, we also have to know there are many hungering people in the world.
The people who want to survive in the cruel world, they must find anything they can get to make lives including cutting trees for fire to warm their home, fishing or hunting for food, and turning the forest into land for cultivating crops or building houses. This is the history of human. We can not question if our ancients' behaviors is right or not, because they need the resource for living.
However, the situation has totally changed when people use the natural resources too much and further, hurt the nature. In the present, we have more ways to make live, and few people have to fight with nature to survive. We need to stop and consider that what we do is right or not because today, there are many endangered animals which need our help and we did save them only if we give up our greed. For example, many Chinese people think the tusk of elephant is a kind of rare herbs, and therefore, there are many greedy businessmen and hunters killing many elephants in order to cut their teeth. However, the experts in Chinese herb tell us there are many herbs instead of the elephants' tusks.
In short, when we are going to develop some area, there are many researches and evaluations needed to do to know the effect of environment. Our modern world has owed the earth too much, and the damage done before is hard to repair. Only one thing we can do is preserve the world now.
沒有留言:
張貼留言